Get free updates - subscribe to our monthly newsletter Subscribe
Recent developments are pushing the legal sector towards the two Cs – Consolidation and Commoditisation.
Many law firms are understandably worried that pressure is being applied to their top line income as commoditisation drives down the prices being charged in the marketplace.
However, it is not the commoditisation itself that is driving the price down, commoditisation is a result of the market pressures of supply and demand, and it is those factors that impact on the price which suppliers are able to charge.
There is a move in the general economy towards demand from the public for remote service, online service and non-business hours’ service. As suppliers are able to meet this demand, particularly if they do so in bulk, they find that their unit costs fall since the delivery methods are more cost effective. They can, therefore, pass these savings to their customers with the aim of competing for a larger share of the developing market.
As customers become more used to these lower prices, they use those prices as a benchmark for the amount that they expect to pay to all suppliers delivering what they see as the same service, something that the online price comparison sites have encouraged.
Looking towards the legal sector in particular, there are some firms that have changed their delivery methods to match the changing demand from clients. These firms have found that they have been able to reduce their charges and move towards fixed fees. That has, in turn, put pressure on other firms to do the same.
Price is always going to be an important factor to clients, particularly if they see competing firms offering the same service, or product. However, it is not the most important issue to all clients. At the end of the day, all clients will be looking for the lowest price – but the lowest price for the service that they require. It may well be that they are prepared to pay a higher price when they know that they will receive that required service. An example of this would be with repeat clients, where it is often the case that even if they could receive the same level of service elsewhere, they aren’t sure that that is the case. On the other hand, for other clients, if in their minds they only require a standard service that they could obtain from any supplier, then they would expect to pay a lower price.
Most firms are now looking at ways to protect their income whether that is via:
However, it could be argued that firms shouldn’t be asking whether price is important to clients, perhaps they should be asking whether they are operating with the appropriate profit margins for the market-driven prices, although I accept that certain scale is required to cover fixed costs.
If demand in the marketplace is changing, then suppliers should evolve to meet that demand or they will ultimately perish, unless they can educate the market of the benefits of their service.
This is why the market is being pushed towards the second C – Consolidation – with the aim of generating synergies and economies of scale in order to deliver services more cost effectively.
Protecting profit margins would also mean re-assessing the way in which services are delivered to clients and focusing on what the clients really want and value. In many cases, that could be delivered at a lower cost to the practice and therefore protect profit margins despite falling income levels.
After all, it has often been said that turnover is vanity, but profit is sanity.
If you like this article and would like our FREE updates sent straight to your inbox then subscribe to our monthly newsletterSubscribe
All content © 2015 Armstrong Watson. All Rights Reserved. Website by Simon Pighills.
Armstrong Watson LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales, number OC415608. The registered office is 15 Victoria Place, Carlisle, CA1 1EW where a list of members is kept. Armstrong Watson LLP is regulated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales for a range of investment business activities. Unless otherwise indicated, either expressly or by the context, we use the word “partner” to describe a member of Armstrong Watson LLP or an employee of Armstrong Watson LLP in their capacity as such.
Armstrong Watson Audit Limited is registered to carry on audit work in the UK and Ireland by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales, number 8800970. The registered office is 15 Victoria Place, Carlisle, CA1 1EW.
Armstrong Watson Financial Planning Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Firm reference number 542122. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales, number 7208672. The registered office is 15 Victoria Place, Carlisle, CA1 1EW. Armstrong Watson Financial Planning & Wealth Management is a trading style of Armstrong Watson Financial Planning Limited.
Armstrong Watson Trustees Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales, number 84495656. The registered office is 15 Victoria Place, Carlisle, CA1 1EW.